Magyar nyelven ide kattintva olvasható a cikk!
In the summer of 2020, at the height of the COVID panic, Bolivia was dancing on the edge of the abyss.
Hospitals were full, people were dying, as the country — like every other — followed the WHO-dictated “no treatment, stay home” protocol.
The situation was made dramatically worse by the fact that Bolivia is one of the poorest countries in the world, meaning that only a fraction of the healthcare resources available in the developed Western nations were accessible there.
To make matters even worse, it is also one of the highest-altitude countries on Earth, where the oxygen content of the air is naturally lower.
Here, a lung-damaging virus — or a flawed protocol leading to pneumonia — was not merely dangerous, but a death sentence…
…And, just as everywhere else in the world, the official protocols failed here as well.
At that point, a few doctors — among them Dr. Patricia Callisperis — did something that, according to global medical dogmas, was considered an unforgivable sin: they dared to think.
It must be mentioned that Dr. Andreas Kalcker played a tremendous role in all of this. He has dedicated the past seventeen years of his life to researching and sharing knowledge about the workings and therapeutic potential of CDS (chlorine dioxide solution).
Just before the outbreak of the pandemic, he gave numerous lectures to South American doctors and healthcare professionals, opening many eyes to the true potential of this molecule.
In that same period, he conducted extensive presentations on the therapeutic possibilities of CDS, helping many to understand what this substance is truly capable of when used correctly. Thus, when all other tools failed, these doctors turned to this inexpensive, decades-old disinfectant — chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) — because they already knew, understood, and had seen with their own eyes what it could do.
The results were not surprising to them. But for others, they were shocking — in the best possible way. Patients’ oxygen levels began to improve, inflammation subsided, and most importantly — the patients survived.
The Uprising of the People for Truth
The news spread like wildfire. People who had been abandoned by the official narrative demanded a solution. Lines formed outside pharmacies.
Universities, military laboratories, and local municipalities began producing and distributing chlorine dioxide for free. This was not merely a therapeutic experiment — it was a revolution: the revolution of common sense against helplessness and the greed that had been placed above human life.
Under public pressure — and through the skilled collaboration of a few courageous doctors — politics finally yielded. In October 2020, the Bolivian Parliament passed a law authorizing the medical use of chlorine dioxide. They made history.
The Global Machine’s Counterattack
The world roared. The WHO, the international media and a chorus of experts funded by the pharmaceutical lobby immediately sprang into action. The anatomy of the smear campaign was textbook-perfect:
The “Bleach” label: They deliberately conflated chlorine dioxide with household bleach, even though they are chemically completely different compounds. That is a vile sleight of hand — like calling ethanol only an industrial solvent while conveniently ignoring that, in the right dose, it is the active ingredient in wine and beer.
The diversion from science: Instead of debating the scientific facts, they attacked the phenomenon’s social context, shouting “quackery” and “charlatanism.” In this way they comfortably avoided confronting decades of peer-reviewed scientific literature.
The straw-man argument: They attacked the most extreme, “cures everything” claims in order to ridicule the whole topic, without uttering a single word about the molecularly proven, specific actions. Yet the science was already clear. Chlorine dioxide is not a crude, indiscriminate poison but a highly refined, selective oxidizer. Its dual mechanism is striking: by size-selectivity it destroys micron-sized pathogens in milliseconds, while due to the reaction kinetics it penetrates human tissue only about 0.1 mm, creating a natural “protective shield.” It also has a built-in chemical self-limiting mechanism: once it reacts it is immediately converted into a much weaker, “milder” compound (chlorite), preventing further damage. Against viruses it acts like a precision weapon: it oxidizes a single, strategically critical amino acid (tryptophan-153) in the influenza virus’s hemagglutinin protein, making attachment to cells impossible. For example, with poliovirus it does not attack the outer coat but directly renders the genetic material — the RNA — nonfunctional at concentrations that are harmless to host cells.
You can learn more about the scientific background of chlorine dioxide in detail by reading the following article:
The Evidence the World Didn’t Want to See — or Wasn’t Allowed to See
The results spoke for themselves. In September 2020, before the law came into effect, the daily death rate stood at 133 per million inhabitants. Six weeks later, with the widespread use of chlorine dioxide, that number had plummeted to two.
The WHO was later forced to acknowledge that Bolivia had achieved the lowest mortality rate in the entire region — yet the word chlorine dioxide was cowardly omitted from their report.
The Hidden Opportunity: What the World Lost
If the world had listened to Bolivia back then — instead of chasing profit — we would not be speaking today about one of the darkest, most expensive, and most destructive periods in human history.
There would have been no lockdowns that crushed the global economy.
A lifetime of work — millions of small businesses — was wiped out by a policy that, under the slogan “stay home,” took away freedom but never stopped the virus. The Bolivian model would never have required economic suicide, because its focus was on healing — not isolation.There would have been no reign of fear and masks that devastated the mental health of millions. People were stripped of their smiles, human touch was branded a threat, and distrust and distance were made the new social norm. This psychological warfare destroyed communities, while in Bolivia, people found help not from the servants of Big Pharma, but from a simple, tiny molecule available to everyone.
Elderly people would not have died en masse, alone and cut off from their loved ones. In the name of “protocol,” they were denied a last handshake, a final embrace. That was not science — it was institutionalized cruelty. While the world sacrificed its humanity on the altar of bureaucracy, Bolivians were, in essence, healing each other.
And most importantly: humanity would never have been coerced into taking experimental gene-based injections that turned out to prevent neither infection nor transmission. Instead of studying a safe, well-known molecule — whose human safety had even béén confirmed in EPA-funded, drug-grade research — they forced an entirely new, experimental technology upon mankind. The result: thousands of cases of myocarditis, autoimmune diseases, turbo cancers, and sudden deaths — all now being quietly normalized as part of everyday life.
But the world didn’t listen — or rather, it heard the wrong voices. Fear, greed, and scientific dogmatism prevailed.
Bolivian doctors — among them Dr. Patricia Callisperis — wanted to officially document the results of the chlorine dioxide program and present their success in a scientific format. They applied for authorization to launch a prospective, double-blind clinical trial, even preparing a placebo solution that tasted identical but contained no active ingredient, ensuring the study met every scientific standard.
The Bolivian Drug Agency (AGEMED), however — against all professional logic — denied the authorization. According to Dr. Callisperis, the agency’s pharmaceutical division had initially approved the study, but the decision was later overturned by “higher levels.”
And that was not the end of it. AGEMED went even further, denying access to the medical data needed to conduct a retrospective observational study.
In other words: they not only blocked the trial itself, but also forbade the researchers from scientifically analyzing the patient data that had already been collected.
As a result, the official scientific documentation of Bolivia’s chlorine dioxide program was never allowed to be completed — a decision that, by all appearances, was not accidental, but deliberate. Yet this suppression could not erase reality.
The epidemic curve collapsed, COVID disappeared completely in several cities, and both public experience and epidemiological data spoke for themselves — despite all official bans.
Interestingly, Bolivia’s El País television, one of the country’s largest media outlets, did show both sides of the debate: they interviewed a clinical researcher who emphasized the safety and effectiveness of chlorine dioxide, followed by a health authority representative claiming there was “insufficient evidence” and that it “could be dangerous.”
This stood in stark contrast to how, for example, the U.S. media treated topics like ivermectin or chlorine dioxide — where the phrases “toxic bleach” or “horse dewormer” were repeated endlessly, without ever presenting the other side.
Bolivia’s success — or rather, the persecution that followed it — still echoes to this day.
It showed, beyond any doubt, that there was indeed another path: a cheap, effective, and universally accessible one.
But the truth had to be silenced — because chlorine dioxide cannot be patented. It brings no profit. It simply heals.
The poetic question of history is no longer what happened, or why. It is why the chance for healing was denied to humanity — why millions had to die while the solution was right before our eyes all along, and still is to this very day.
Time to fill the glass with clean water - and the truth - The Scientific Reality of Chlorine Dioxide, or Why the "Drinking Bleach" Propaganda is False and Deceptive
Magyar nyelven ide kattintva olvasható a cikk!
CDS is like the balancing pole in your hands. A support that helps you stay steady between lifeless embers and raging fire.
Life is a delicate, fragile dance. Let us imagine it as an ancient, sacred fire. When the embers merely flicker and give off little warmth, our life force is weak, the body grows cold, and underfunctions. When the fire burns in a controlled, warming flame, it gives energy, radiates light, and sustains life – this is the state of health. But if the flame…
